Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 5701 - 5720 of 133,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by appealattorneylaw
  Well, for those of you who are thinking that the next step will be filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, you may want to read this article that I read this morning. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
Interpretation of the 'plain meaning' of the statute may include consideration of the context in which it was passed, and the evil intended to be addressed, and to prohibit only contracts for successful lobbying would not effect the purpose. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Sarah McKeeve, Brodies LLP
Mr McCann raised an action for judicial review of that decision in May 2012. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:34 pm
Sure, federal courts scholars may on occasion go ballistic, but rarely do you see actual judges wax poetic about the need for one or more of these doctrines to be modified in light of patently inefficient federal duplication of state court litigation.But it happens. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
As chief justice of the United States, Chase is chiefly remembered for his nationalistic opinion in Texas v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:22 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Greene King Plc v Quisine Restaurants Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 698 (24 May 2012) Hinchcliffe & Anor v Smith & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 696 (24 May 2012) Ingosstrakh -Investments v BNP Paribas SA [2012] EWCA Civ 644 (24 May 2012) Cavenagh v William Evans Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 697 (24 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of)… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm by Richard Frank
But the most influential lawyer arguing tomorrow may well be acting U.S. [read post]