Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 5701 - 5720 of 8,607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
The workplace bias case granted review is University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas In Lawrence, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:58 am by Jon Sands
Texas, 409 U.S. 95 (1972). [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 7:35 am by Guest Blogger
Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 852 (1992)).Cary Franklin is Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
In a federal case I testified in recently (US v Simmons), the defendant's compliance with the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act was material in the case because in the application for search warrant, the DEA agent referenced the Ogden & Cole memos (which describe the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm by Pamela Vesilind
  Worse, writes James McWilliams, a history professor at Texas State University who has launched a one-man campaign against DIY animal slaughter, it desensitizes people to the suffering of other living beings. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:50 am by Lyle Denniston
Texas (docket 12-246) — was one of six new cases accepted for review. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 12-5813, appears to be a fairly straightforward hold for Boyer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 am by Lyle Denniston
   Among many cases considered at that session, the Justices pondered a request from the state of Texas to grant speedy review of the state’s appeal seeking to revive its post-2010 redistricting plans for both houses of its state legislature and for its thirty-six-member delegation in the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
   Another case we have been following is State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]