Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 10,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
The United States formally confirmed that it made a “mistake” in accidently striking Syrian regime forces instead of Islamic State fighters on September 17th, the BBC tells us. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Brunetti appealed this rejection to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which found this prohibition on immoral or scandalous marks to be in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm
I mean, the United States would treat both the same, right? [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Inforrm also had a quick preview of the year ahead, marking its return from a winter break. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:49 pm
From Elansari v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
United States, Polygamy, and Imperialism, (William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-43, Feb. 26, 2010).Jill I. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
The United States scarcely resembles the fledgling republic that emerged at the end of the 18th century. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
Carter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:02 am
One is, alas, only in French and Italian: it's Case T-392/04 Gagliardi v OHIM, Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
United States. [read post]
