Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5701 - 5720 of 10,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– McLean, VA lawyer Mark Dombroff of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Plane-ly Spoken Supreme Court rules induced infringement requires a 271(a) direct infringer (Limelight v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States quotes Justice Felix Frankfurter's classic article, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 Colum. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm by Paralegal Student
In a decision dated February 12th 2014, the Supreme Court of Ontario upheld this verdict citing a 2009 case Royal Bank v McPherson. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am by Tara Hofbauer
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm by Wells Bennett
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:26 pm by Nikki Siesel
The United States Patent & Trademark Office issued registrations for these marks in 2008 and 2009 respectively. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:30 am by Wells Bennett
This marks the most significant among many dates set by the Second Amended Scheduling Order, in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 Despite all the violence that marked the civil rights revolution, the methods championed by , together with the sweeping political victories of racial liberalism in the Martin Luther King's adaptation of Gandhi-like methods, together with the decisive and bipartisan electoral victories of the 1960s, gained a bipartisan "mandate from the People" for  landmark statutes and judicial super-precedents that went far beyond the more formal principles of racial… [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
  He concludes that “the real effect of [United States v.] [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
United States Department of Justice Judicial Watch’s request was filed under FOIA, a federal law that took effect in 1967. [read post]