Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5701 - 5720 of 6,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2022, 4:43 am by jonathanturley
” As previously discussed, the bill being referenced by the President and Democrats is not a codification of Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hardwick, in which the Supreme Court upheld Georgia’s anti-sodomy law against constitutional attack, LGBT rights advocates regrouped.They used the litigation loss to inspire outrage and strengthen resolve among constituents.The Bowers defeat increased grassroots mobilization, fundraising, and organizational founding, all of which proved vital to a stronger movement.Advocates also reworked their strategy to focus on state-based venues.Between the Bowers and Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Ferguson,  then in1954 overruled it in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
Jan. 23, 2023) (rejecting a First Amendment defense to a prosecution over text messages telling Hillary Clinton voters that they could vote by text). * Twitter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
  The “skeptical” blogger Jack of Kent has a piece “Libel Reform the Day after the General Election” lamenting the failure of Dr Evan Harris and Joanne Cash to attract the support of the voters. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
  Article 3 of Protocol 1 (A3P1), ECHR – protecting the right to free elections – does not permit blanket bans on prisoner voting in legislative elections (Hirst v UK (No 2) App No.74025/01 (2005);  Scoppola v Italy (No 3) App No. 126/05 (2012)). [read post]