Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 66,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
Criminal Defense Lawyers Are Required to Tell Client of Deportation Risk Before Entering Guilty Plea
22 Jun 2011, 9:25 am
At Shorstein & Lasnetski, we handle immigration cases as well as criminal cases so, unlike most other criminal lawyers in the Jacksonville, Florida area, we are qualified to fully advise you if you are not a United States citizen and are facing criminal charges., In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Padilla v. [read post]
Criminal Defense Lawyers Are Required to Tell Client of Deportation Risk Before Entering Guilty Plea
22 Jun 2011, 9:25 am
At Shorstein & Lasnetski, we handle immigration cases as well as criminal cases so, unlike most other criminal lawyers in the Jacksonville, Florida area, we are qualified to fully advise you if you are not a United States citizen and are facing criminal charges., In 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Padilla v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Freeman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:22 pm
Corcoran v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am
The court rejected Gaunt’s case stating that the “broadcast was undoubtedly highly offensive to Mr Stark and was well capable of offending the broadcast audience”. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:04 pm
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:15 pm
Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald describe the background of the Eighth Circuit case of Niang v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:00 am
In Bond v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:41 am
This case from Washington state, Schmidt v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:08 am
While the Constitution is in many ways a beautifully written document, the framers deserve no gold stars when it comes to how they phrased the Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Earlier this week in Berry v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 7:05 am
Well, Warwick v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 4:53 am
In UNITED STATES v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 2:55 pm
However, for those that are not, and wish an easy reading recent case from the First Circuit that will give you some idea of how it operates post-CAFRA (Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000), I refer you to today's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
The United States District Court here in the 6th Circuit recently decided Jerman v Carlisle, 502 F Supp 2nd 686 (2007). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 2:46 am
Though this is well-settled law, e.g., United States v. [read post]
