Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 60,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Authority v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm
See Cheek v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:54 pm
Plaintiff, a California citizen, worked in a nonexempt, hourly paid position for defendants, each of whom is a corporate citizen of another state, in California. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:24 pm
Nosal is still a disturbing ruling for the reasons stated in the dissenting judge's opinion. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
It’s called Shettleworth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
It’s called Shettleworth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Dillinger, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 10:54 am
United States, is a win for small businesses and very good for those that work on Green Globes projects. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:57 am
The defense does not agree that United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
The work cited was Professor Forte’s article “The Framers’ Idea of Marriage and Family” within the book The Meaning of Marriage : Family, State, Market, and Morals. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:00 am
In MackMuhammad v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
Facts: This case (Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:34 am
"Stevens Law Office v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
§17 of Article I, of the New York State Constitution provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o laborer, worker or mechanic, in the employ of a contractor or sub-contractor engaged in the performance of any public work ... shall ... be paid less than the rate of wages prevailing in the same trade or occupation in the locality within the state where such public work is to be situated, erected or used;" 2. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Nampa Classical Academy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
In Novo the claimant’s mother was injured at work when a stack of racking boards fell on her. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
One of my favorites concerned the 1953 California appellate court case, Banks v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
