Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 6,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Orin Kerr explains: The Third Circuit disagrees, concluding that officers should know that GPS devices are so different from beepers that the beeper cases can’t apply to GPS surveillance: As our foregoing discussion suggests: we disagree with this position. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
But Orin Kerr @ Volokh has also first-hand confirmed the appointment: How Did the White House Pick Its Law Blogger? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
(HT Orin Kerr) [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
As some of you may recall, frequent commenter and Volokh conspirator Orin Kerr argued the case for Davis before the Supreme Court and published a well-argued law review article on the subject too boot. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:32 am
(Orin Kerr) The decision is In re INNOVATIO IP VENTURES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
I make the statement in response to documents placed by Sir John Kerr in the National Archives which were recently released and have been discussed by Professor Hocking in volume two of her biography of Mr Whitlam. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
Lord Kerr would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 3:57 am
’ If you’re looking for scholarly discussion of the opinion, you would do better to read Orin Kerr’s thoughts, or perhaps Lior Strahilevitz and Matthew Tokson. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 10:43 pm
In the past week, Orin Kerr added to 2 new rules to the ever-expanding Volokh list. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm
., decided Thursday by the Texas Court of Appeals (Fort Worth), by Justice Elizabeth Kerr, joined by Justices Mike Wallach and Brian Walker; I think it likely would have come out the same way in other states, under the "fair report" privilege, which applies to accurate reporting of contents of government documents—but the court's logic would have applied even had the report not been a government document: [Todd] Gallaher is a political consultant who was selected in… [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
It appears from the judgment that the ISA have not yet made the barring decision but, as Lord Kerr, dissenting from the majority, pointed out it was inconceivable that the ISA would not be heavily influenced by the school’s decision to dismiss; “Although the actual determination takes place at the point when ISA decides whether to include the respondent on the list, the anterior stage of disciplinary proceedings cannot be left out of account in deciding whether the… [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
And in a post from July that I missed, Professor Orin Kerr, one of the leading voices for that narrower version of the CFAA, gave his take on recent decisions and legislative developments for The Volokh Conspiracy (a hat tip to Kenneth Vanko for posting this article). [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 5:32 am
Orin Kerr called this “hyperventilating. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 4:30 am
- Orin Kerr at Volokh weighs in on the matter, with a rather "law and order" bent, with many commenters giving a wide range of opinions. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr is “pretty certain” that the Court will “reverse on immunity grounds,” while Adam Liptak of the New York Times agrees that the “Justices’ lack of engagement at the argument probably signaled a victory for the government. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:23 pm
In the 40 years since, the case has been cited 7,659 times according to Westlaw (and Orin Kerr). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
But after a recent, lackadaisical heavyweight title bout coupled with renewed Fourth Amendment interest from grass-roots conservative quarters, perhaps Grits would revise that to say Americans care more about the Fourth Amendment than boxing, though probably still less than soccer.At SCOTUSBlog, Orin Kerr reviews the Fourth Amendment cases from the latest US Supreme Court and finds their rulings routinely in favor of the government by vast margins. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr dissects the latest decision (and, in case you’re unclear, is no fan of the concept that people commit a crime under the CFAA based on TOS): Judge Graber also offers this distinction between terms of use and cease-and-desist letters: Finally, Nosal I [on terms of use] was most concerned with transforming “otherwise innocuous behavior into federal crimes simply because a computer is involved. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Without a doubt, the appellants must surely be equally delighted with the outcome in their case because Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Clarke and Reed unanimously held that the burden of proving a “marriage of convenience” falls on the Home Office. [read post]
