Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently struck down and how it might fare at the Supreme Court if – as state officials plan to request – the Justices were to review it on the merits. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court will not review FCC media ownership rules and challenges to the "Red Lion" doctrine http://t.co/NGtNL6KF 12:51:54, 2012-06-29 The Supreme Court overreach nobody is talking about. http://t.co/cb9gVqyu 08:35:03, 2012-06-29 After Supreme Court ruling, the FCC and TV networks will proceed with business as usual http://t.co/T1GVykNb 20:31:32, 2012-06-28 The Roberts Court Is Born http://t.co/BnCIn6SS 20:06:14,… [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:54 am
And: The advisory committee includes: • Chairwoman: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (retired) • Justice Rebecca Love Kourlis of the Colorado Supreme Court (retired) • Chief Justice Ruth McGregor of the Arizona Supreme Court (retired) • Meryl Chertoff, director of the Sandra Day O'Connor Project on the State of the Judiciary at Georgetown Law • Diane Gates Wallach of Cody Resources, liaison to the… [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
There are those who say the Supreme Court involves itself in too much of American life. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:32 pm
Absent a “conflicting” supreme court decision, federal courts should follow the state appellate court consensus. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 2:35 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
The court temporarily stayed the Order to allow the Government until March 12, 2020 to seek intervention by the Supreme Court, and also limited enforcement of its injunction to border areas within the Court’s jurisdiction, that is California and Arizona. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm
The court temporarily stayed the Order to allow the Government until March 12, 2020 to seek intervention by the Supreme Court, and also limited enforcement of its injunction to border areas within the Court’s jurisdiction, that is California and Arizona. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:12 pm
There is a hope that this issue will reach the United States Supreme Court, but there is some uncertainty now with the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:40 am
Supreme Court rejected the Republican National Committee’s request to block Rhode Island from eliminating witness/notary requirements for vote by mail in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:55 am
The United States Supreme Court has held that an officer must have a reasonable suspicion of a criminal or traffic offense to stop a vehicle. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 11:14 am
(See Arizona v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
By: Stephen Koerting* Arizona’s Immigration Law S.B. 1070 made national news when it was passed by state legislation in 2010, and again when the Supreme Court sustained the law’s centerpiece in June of this year. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:15 pm
By: Stephen Koerting* Arizona’s Immigration Law S.B. 1070 made national news when it was passed by state legislation in 2010, and again when the Supreme Court sustained the law’s centerpiece in June of this year. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am
Analysis A divided Supreme Court on Thursday sent a strong signal that states will be free to experiment with new laws dealing with unlawful aliens living within their borders, at least when the states seek to control access to jobs. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
Dissenting, Bybee argues that the fault lay in the California Supreme Court, which never notified the petitioner. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:13 am
The court also found that even after the federal government rescinded its agreement with the Sheriff's office authorizing officers to enforce certain provisions of immigration law, and after the Supreme Court made clear in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
Sounds like a question for the Texas Supreme Court, says the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
