Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 5721 - 5740 of 7,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Fahy presented oral argument in the 1st internment case to reach the Supreme Court, Hirabayashi v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am by Michael O'Hear
  As originally introduced, the FSA would have equalized the treatment of crack and powder[7]—which is precisely what is done in the great majority of states.[8] Although powder cocaine sentencing provides the most natural benchmark to assess the proportionality of crack sentencing, it is not the only benchmark that should be borne in mind. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am by Marty Lederman
  The two December cases are Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:25 am
The two subject children were born in May 2004 and April 2007. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:45 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Deepak VarmaThe Supreme Court in Mohammad Ahmad v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:20 am by admin
The temporary maintenance award was adequate given other expenses borne by husband. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:08 pm
Federal courts follow the Daubert standard (from the case Daubert v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As noted yesterday, CAAF’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:49 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 First, here is the basic demographic data:   Minnesota Wisconsin Population (2009) 5.3 mm 5.7 mm Age under 18 24.3% 23.6% Age over 65 12.4% 13.2% Over 25, HS diploma 91.1% 89.0% Bachelor degree 31.2% 25.5% Below poverty line 10.0% 11.1% Foreign born 5.3% 3.6% Unemployment 5.8% 6.1%   Not much to distinguish the states here. [read post]