Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 31,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 1:36 am
iStock_000000130176.jpg In child pornography prosecution, detective's lay or expert testimony that images on the defendant's computer media satisfied the legal definition of child pornography was not helpful to the jury since it was only a "bare conclusion"; however its admission was not plain error based on the defense concession in closing argument that the photos were pornographic and that the defense only denied producing the photos, in… [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:06 am
Nesmith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm
Golan v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am
Chen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:59 am
The father received the child benefit and child tax credit, though in practice this was split. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:33 am
The defendant downloaded child porn. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:13 pm
So where's the child porn coming from? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
On November 9, 2011, the Superior Court filed its first decision (E.D. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:02 am
In Wednesday's Sonya J. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:33 am
Caplan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:22 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 1037 (25 August 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Deutsche Bank Ag v Tongkah Harbour Public Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 2251 (QB) (24 August 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Yameen, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2250 (Admin) (25 August 2011) Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:05 pm
Irizarry v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:49 am
In Jordan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:02 pm
F.S. 784.021 makes it an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon to intentionally harm someone with a bow and arrow, and courts have held (in Peevey v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:07 am
Mullins v. [read post]
