Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5721 - 5740 of 29,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 2:16 pm by Jay McDaniel
Precision Lift, Inc., 654 F. 3d 289 (9th Cir. 2011) involved a failed joint venture between the plaintiff and defendant to build and market maintenance stands that allow mechanics to access the outside of aircraft. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:50 am
F&T Int'l (Flushing, New York) LLC, 101817/05 (New York County Supreme Court, June 25, 2007), the two Plaintiffs were undocumented workers. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
At both interviews detectives advised the defendant of his Miranda rights and the defendant stated he understood and waived those rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Mejia, 545 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2008), the court vacated a VICAR conviction due to the government's improper use of an "officer expert. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:06 am by Matt C. Bailey
Conoco-Phillips Co., in which the Ninth Circuit criticized the district court for inappropriately emphasizing objectively determinable factual issues in denying class certification--even though the court did not deny that plaintiffs' actual legal theory was one in which common issues of law or fact predominated over individual questions. 593 F.3d 802, 808 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Edwards, 290 F.3d 699, 716 (4th Cir. 2002).Judge Houck is bound by that decision, delivered by the federal Circuit Court of Appeals to which is own court is subject. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:30 am
Phillips, 468 F.3d 1264, 1266 (10th Cir. 2006) (holding that DNA evidence, obtained pursuant to a search warrant, was admissible despite fact that supporting affidavit relied on a defendant's statements offered in a custodial environment without a Miranda warning). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:10 am
Defendant did not validly consent to a search of his car, and an inventory search of the car was not justified either. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
Co. 89 F.3d 525 (8th Cir. 1996) that "[a] party that engages in affirmative activity in federal court typically waives the right to seek a remand. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm by Jon Sands
Ives, 950 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]