Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5721 - 5740 of 29,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” “[I]f The Fix maintained its status as an independent journal, unaffiliated with Cliffside, it is unclear to the Court how any false or misleading statements made by The Fix could ever be considered actionable ‘wrongdoing’ under the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:08 am by Yige Wang
Defendants have allegedly violated Section 6103(f), the Committee’s Article I subpoena power, and the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:01 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The original charges were still pending in district court at the time the state obtained the indictment, and “[i]f an action in District Court was properly pending, as it was here, the statute of limitations continued to be tolled. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The Pro Side of BlendedTo defend blended products, one can point to the quantity of animal flesh in a mixed beef and plant burger compared to a pure beef burger. [read post]
The FCA’s mental intent requirement therefore gives taxpayers a unique and strong advantage to defending against an FCA claim. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Within the two-month period under Article 108 EPC, the opponent filed notice of appeal and paid the corresponding appeal fee. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Wisconsin, in which the justices held that a state law allowing law enforcement to draw blood from unconscious drivers without a warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment, “leaves just a little bit of daylight for defendants. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:44 am by Tilem & Associates
According to the court’s opinion, the defendant was present in the United States on an F-1 student visa. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
Defendants’ counsel should take note. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm by Benjamin Battles
Indeed, Paul Clement, representing the North Carolina defendants in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:54 am by Steve Minor
Pettit, 164 F.3d 857, 861 (4th Cir. 1998) ('Taken at its face value, the term ‘relates to’ has no logical boundary. [read post]