Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5721 - 5740 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
’ (California Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6(b)(1)) Glaser v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:52 am by Eric Alexander
  And, lastly, this may be the only summary judgment decision we have read on an implantable surgical device that does not mention preemption. [read post]
17 May 2013, 2:11 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Because it was not before it, the district court refused to decide if the 20% formulation set forth in the DOL Handbook is entitled to controlling deference, but cautioned plaintiff that an order of dismissal would be imminent if she did nothing more than amend her complaint to include an allegation that the defendants required her to spend more than 20% of her time on duties that did not generate tips or that were outside her tipped occupation. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Salla,  --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2013 WL 1681220 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
The DPA/NPA debate does not stand in a vacuum. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:05 pm by John J. Sullivan
Code § 34-20-5-1.Gresser involved the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which required Dow to register its termiticide with the EPA. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:59 am by Eric Alexander
May 1, 2013), we satisfied all four of these rare (for us) criteria. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:01 pm by David O. Klein and Jonathan E. Turco
  In contrast, Texas requires that the MLM file, in addition to other items (1) a financial statement; (2) a complete description of the program participant-compensation structure; (3) disclosure of all persons with a 20% or greater ownership interest in the MLM; and (4) copies of all program promotional materials. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:33 pm by David Jensen
Klein defended the involvement of McEwen, who Klein said has contributed to the stem cell group conducting the meeting. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:23 am by Florian Mueller
In paragraph 1 it proposes a distinction between NPEs and PAEs that I hadn't seen before -- these terms are synonyms. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 63084, March 20, 2013) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaints, holding that Defendants cannot be held liable under RLUIPA for monetary damages and that any request for injunctive relief under RLUIPA is moot because issues relating to the Ramadan meals and vegetarian supplemental snacks were resolved. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
If I had to wager, I would say that the Court will deny review, particularly because Guerrero arises on the defendants' demurrer. [read post]