Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 5721 - 5740 of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
The New York Court of Appeals – the state’s highest court -is about to consider an important property rights case, Goldstein v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief Constable… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:36 am
Following the Supreme Court’s 2012 recognition of concurrent federal and state jurisdiction over Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class actions in Mims v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
TRA was associated with an armed group, the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL), which was at war with the then-Government of Liberia. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:53 pm by N. Scott Pierce
Despite potentially relevant Supreme Court precedent in Thomas and Granfinanciera, the better view under the weight of Supreme Court precedent with respect to patent validity, absent the recent decision by the Court in Oil States, is that determination of the validity of issued patents does not include the government as a party and, therefore, only private rights are involved. [read post]