Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 5721 - 5740 of 61,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:08 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The plaintiff appealed to the state court of appeals, and that court agreed with trial court and affirmed the grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:15 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary from ScotusBlog, which also links to cert papers and opinions below: Martinez v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:11 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary from ScotusBlog, which also links to briefs and opinion below: Wall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Case C-709/20 CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 5:28 am by Barsumian Armiger
State affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Department of Transportation (collectively “INDOT”) finding INDOT immune from liability in a lawsuit brought by Tracy Ladra (“Ladra”), who suffered injuries when her vehicle hydroplaned on a flooded portion of I-94. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
 Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
In March 2017, a judge in Suffolk County, possibly for the first time in this state, granted custody of a child to three people. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
By comparing and contrasting United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
If it were not for Kentucky Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]