Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his "wife", in children's proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:22 pm
Giles v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 4:16 am
At base, the trial court had held that the law firm did not owe a fiduciary duty to the wife concerning her late husband’s life insurance policy. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:52 am
When the ancillary relief application went before him on the 6th April 2006 and the wife did not appear, the district judge, clearly frustrated by the wife's (in)action, made an order transferring all known assets to the husband, in an attempt to shock the wife into cooperating, despite the fact that the husband only sought an equal division of assets. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:06 am
In Spence v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 1:33 am
Husband and wife divide all of the marital property but wife's student loan debt. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Robert's Hair Designers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
The problem in Laura Ww. v Peter Ww was that the husband never signed the consent. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
Reed v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 11:24 am
Bousman (NFP). an 11-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Robb writes:Cynthia Miller appeals the trial court's order granting Mark Bousman, Miller's ex-husband, relief from judgment. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:02 pm
The Court of Appeals gave short shrift to that part of the husband's argument, too. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:55 am
In Green v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:41 am
Does the answer turn on whether the husband and wife executed a prior agreement on the issue? [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 4:58 am
Porreco, which addressed whether a wife fairly relied on her husband's claim that an engagement ring was worth $21,000 when, in fact, the stone in it was fake. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Street v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
Husband's objection to consent at CID office did not prevent CID from asking his wife without telling her that he refused. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
Randolph, 547 U.S. (2006), to analyze a situation where a husband and wife are both at a law enforcement agency's office where the suspect spouse refuses to give consent to search the home computer while the non-suspect spouse gives such authority unaware that her husband has refused consent. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
To download a copy of the Civil Court’s decision, please use this link: Landry v. [read post]
