Search for: "I v. B" Results 5721 - 5740 of 24,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 12:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
”]IntroductionPart I-A: Duck-Rabbits in EquityPart I-B: Counting to 21 Similarities By the mid-1970s judges in both the Second and Ninth Circuits realized that the “recognizability” standard for copyright infringement determinations was unworkable. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:03 am by John Gregory
In fact B&P do conclude that enforcement depends on the facts. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:25 am
In Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-132/05 February 26, 2008), the European Court of Justice held that "Since the Federal Republic of Germany has therefore failed to show that the name ‘Parmesan' has become generic, use of the word ‘Parmesan' for cheese which does not comply with the specification for the Protected Designation of Origin… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, Tugendhat J considered the nature of the medium of publication to be important: “I must bear in mind that what is complained of is not a newspaper article but a TV broadcast. [read post]