Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 5721 - 5740 of 10,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 10:07 am
Maydell, Social Rights and International Law Tafrir Malick Ndiaye, Les droits de l'homme aujourd'hui Ernest Petric, Sovereignty of State v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:12 am by Lyle Denniston
  That case is United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:06 am by Allen L. Harris
Lanza, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:18 am by SHG
  And following a decision out of the Bronx by Judge Edgar Walker in People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:49 am by lawmrh
(a) The code of the west, as derived from the book, Cowboy Ethics by James P. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:48 am by Mike
 The defendants moved to dismiss for misjoinder stating that under the Federal Circuit's decision in Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]