Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 5721 - 5740 of 269,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 10:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals upholds the law and dismisses the case.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:22 pm by Federalist Society
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Gunn v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:42 am
Regina (A) v Croydon London Borough Council; Regina (M) v Lambeth London Borough Council Supreme Court "Where social workers disputed an unaccompanied asylum seeker’s claim to be under the age of 18, and so entitled to local authority accommodation, the question of age was an objective fact subject, in the event of challenge, to determination by the [...] [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:29 am
InsuranceWide.com Services Ltd v Commissioners of Revenue and Customs; Commissioners of Revenue and Customs v Trader Media Group Ltd Chancery Division “Companies offering introductory services to channel would-be customers to insurers by electronic means and who received a commission in the event of a contract of insurance being concluded were insurance brokers or insurance agents falling within [...] [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:48 am
Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust v Hurst and Others; Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council v Arnold and Others Court of Appeal “It was sufficient when launching an equal pay claim to send a written statement of grievance to the employer identifying the issue as an equal pay claim. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:20 am by sally
Shell UK Ltd v Total UK Ltd and Others; Total UK Ltd v Chevron Ltd Court of Appeal “A duty of care was owed to a beneficial owner of property by a defendant who could reasonably foresee that his negligent actions would damage that property. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:49 am
Mank (University of Cincinnati - College of Law) has posted Summers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Joy
The recent decision of Marino Belen v Marino, 2020 ONSC 6124, is a reminder to parents that while changes to family dynamics should be embraced, it must be balanced against social circle guidelines in the new Covid19 era.- Simran BakshiVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:53 pm by Christine A. Stoddard
District Court for the Southern District of California recently addressed the issue in Azar v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:54 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]