Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 28,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court case in Golan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
EPA's Region V requesting justification for changes made to the State's air pollution control plan. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Byrd and State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Mack v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:35 pm
This system was fully functional before the state instituted our filing system which does not make filed documents accessible. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
Bonta, Attorney General of California, made along partisan lines, reverses the judgment of the Ninth Circuit and sets new precedent applicable to all states. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:03 am
Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
" It also offends a line of cases that require states to very narrowly define the class of offenders eligible for the death penalty. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
R (on the application of (1) Homesun Holdings (2) Solar Century Holdings (3) Friends of the Earth) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Admin. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
In Bywaters v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm
State of Florida, July 15, 2016, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Grimes v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
These citations persuade me that the general rule seems to be that non-human entities that are state actors seem to be covered by the anti-libel principle, and so Eugene is probably right about the bottom line. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am
For example, see the West Virginia State Bar and, the STATE BAR OF NEW MEXICO BUDGET DISCLOSURE, which thanks to Popejoy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
At the Fed Soc Blog, James Burnham discusses United States v. [read post]
