Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 5721 - 5740 of 7,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 7:02 am by Kenneth Anderson
Once tasked, the intelligence oversight committees of the Congress must be notified. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:21 pm by Attorney Michael A. Pollack
June 1 marks two legal deadlines in Wisconsin. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:23 pm
Chicago marked a good day for the Court. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:23 am by Chip Merlin
So, the bottom line is that I do not know if it is unconstitutional, but I agree Mark Phillips’ comment: God is now looking with favor on my ability to provide the best "Christian adjustment" possible per contract terms? [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:07 pm by Kelly
If Congress was looking for a way to encourage under-reporting, mark my words, this is it. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Lavoie writes that Kagan “gets high marks as a peacemaker for the fractious faculty of Harvard Law School while she was dean. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
It is politically expedient I suppose to pretend that Paul is an extremist in the Republican Party. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:25 am by Tom Casagrande
I agree Congress intended to liberalize the dilution law by expanding it to be triggered by likely dilution. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:04 pm by Mandelman
I can’t help but think of Mark Twain’s famous remark that “history does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm by Adam Thierer
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 marked an important turning point in this miserable history, as Congress finally acknowledged that facilities-based competition was possible and preferable to the regulated monopoly era of the past. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IP tango)   Poland Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark (Class 46)   Spain Supreme Court clarifies on when to start a civil trade mark infringement case (Class 46)   Sweden Svea Court of Appeal finds claim anticipated - construes claim on basis of terms of the claim, rather than purposive construction adopted by District Court: Pullman-Ermator v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm by Jeff Gamso
  The question, however, was whether the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I of the constitution.The Congress hall have power . . . [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 am by Mandelman
  The real-time, mark-to-market losses are kept out of Administration talking points on the cost of the bailout. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:54 am by Susan Brenner
Before I get to the case itself, I need to provide a little background on federal sentencing law and practice. [read post]