Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
These are real risks which have to be weighed against the benefits of self-regulation including independence from the state and the application of valuable expertise and experience to the realities of practice. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:22 am
En este caso, el abogado prudente y previsor, dispondría de cinco años para reclamar indemnización por los perjuicios pasados. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:16 am
In arguing for this broad definition, the Government relied on an Eastern District of VA decision in a False Claims Act case, United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:20 am
As discussed below, this Court has also interpreted this provision as requiring the complainant to consent to the activity “at the time it occur[s]” (Ewanchuk, at para. 26). [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
There may, however, be a risk that the rule could be abused by moving assets so as to create, or remove, jurisdiction of a particular Member State's courts. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
[¶] Accordingly, we are persuaded that because Ms. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
The Human Rights Convention, in requiring that states ensure respect for family life, protects first and foremost the rights of the child. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
(Harris v City of Santa Monica, February 7, 2013, 96 EPD ¶44749). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
” States are urged by the report to repeal or amend existing IP laws permitting users to be disconnected from the Internet. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play Does “bringing rights home” mean bringing problems home too? [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
R (S) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
The Tribunal has found in past cases (referenced in the transcript) that it can be in the public interest to accept late complaints where the delay is due to a disabling condition (for example, Naziel-Wilson v Providence Health Care and another, 2014 BCHRT 170 at para. 21.) [read post]
