Search for: "Roberts v. State" Results 5721 - 5740 of 16,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
So much for Roberts' goal of a unified court. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by David Gans
”  Jack argues that the back and forth in these briefs, and particularly the agreement that Romer v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:30 am
Employee's promotion as an asset in divorce proceedingsBystricky v Bystricky, Supreme Court, Nassau County, 177 Misc 2d 914Although this case deals with the marital assets of a police officer involved in a divorce, the decision suggests the court's general approach to evaluating benefits resulting from promotions in the public service in divorce proceedings.After passing a civil service examination, Robert W. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
In less than a week, the Court will hear oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]