Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY" Results 5721 - 5740 of 7,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I agree – if Kennedy and Sullivan are anything to go by, the levels are not very high (especially by comparison with damages for defamation; see Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) (24 July 2008) [212] (Eady J); though note also Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2016] 2 WLR 1217, [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (17 December 2015)). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
United States, 136 S. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., and Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
For example, in a statement concurring in the denial of certiorari in Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Wood
Recently, seventeen states urged the Court to use California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Stephen Wermiel
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
Kennedy wrote the main opinion in Saucier. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp and Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
Coykendall of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy in Wichita, Kan., followed by New York State Solicitor General Barbara D. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, its Ur-text, Footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Despite a lack of evidence that abortion regret was a widespread phenomenon, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]