Search for: "See v. See" Results 5721 - 5740 of 122,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In later cases, the House of Lords likewise resisted attempts to use Art 8 as a defence to possession proceedings by local authorities: see Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465; [2006] HLR 22; Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 AC 367, [2008] HLR 45. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:13 pm
, Gulak's idea came after seeing motorbikes in China crowding the streets and spewing smog everywhere.My brother Larry first spotted the Gulak Uno story a couple of years ago and emailed me about it. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:14 pm by Patent Docs
The first, post-grant review (PGR), had some analogies with European opposition practice, in that petitions for PGR could be filed no later than nine months after the patent had granted and any ground of patentability was available as the basis for challenge (see 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm
Furtado from this requirement, but rather would fundamentally change the nature of a peace officer.You can see why. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:20 am
So, for example, if I go to the CanLII report of the Johnson v. [read post]