Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 7,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
I have two small quibbles. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Clorox Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in D.C. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
The second set of cases (Moody v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
All peoples too are ruled by laws which we have either enacted or arranged. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Now that Republicans have become so brazen in their dishonesty, it is important to say so.I will, however, honor convention in at least a small way by noting that Democrats are certainly not angels, such that a few types of hypocrisy are truly equal-opportunity offenses. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, I signed onto an amicus brief urging the New York Court of Appeals to grant review in the case of NHRP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 9:36 pm
But I think it works for Trump v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
The SAHRC has apparently had to close numerous files because people suspected of human rights abuses have been unable to locate and hold accountable. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
I believe our chief executive and her team, our press officers, have done enormously well in public outreach and I think we now have over 100,000 people a year coming through the door. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
The idea of pirates, smugglers, and privateers in the twenty-first century is absurd to most people, including many attorneys. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am
A recent Australian decision in the case of Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156[2] highlights the problem. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Very small number of organizations tend to pass this. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am
(But that still only gives Congress leeway to act against the comparatively small category of viral illegal content, not lawful-but-awful content.) [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
(But that still only gives Congress leeway to act against the comparatively small category of viral illegal content, not lawful-but-awful content.) [read post]
