Search for: "Springs v. Springs"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 6,440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2009, 9:42 am
Personal opinions on this topic are welcome too.An ADA from Parker County chimed in with some personal background:As an intern in the Fort Bend County DA's office, i got to write the appellate brief on Marcus Omar Winston v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
Subscribers & Readers Notice:We are beginning our Spring publication break next week.We resume publication on Monday, April 27, 2009. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:22 am
ScotusBlog analyzes the Supreme Court's opinion in 14 Penn Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
See Perricone v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:12 pm
See Cammack v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46) Greece Well-known MOUYER trade… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
And, in the long run, I'm okay with letting these types of false accusations in at trial rather than letting them spring up on a writ. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:32 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
(This one is Rava v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
In Clock Spring, L.P. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:32 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
Spring Break! [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
" PDL Biopharma, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Courtney Rachel Baron, An Eye for an Eye Leaves Everyone Blind: Fields v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Harrison Hot Springs Hotel Ltd., [1997] 43 B.C.L.R. (3d) 219, 100 B.C.A.C. 212 [Cempel]; Aberdeen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 11:34 am
As such, even if the use was for purposes of testing durability, it could not, as a matter of law, be experimental use, because it was not for purposes of the patent application.The court also affirmed the summary judgment on the Lanham Act false advertising claims, agreeing with the district court there was no evidence the two challenged statements were false.More detail of Clock Spring, L.P. v. [read post]
