Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 27,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2010, 1:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
Code § 22.021(a)(2)(A)(iv) (West 2015). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:05 am
" Today's ruling in Ayers v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the government’s… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
McMonagle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
§ 521(a)(1)(B)(iv), (a)(1)(B)(v), and (e)(2)(A)(i). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
” Healy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Matter of Martinez v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 04096 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JUSTICE SOUTER: It is an object that has coded onto it, transferred to it in a readable way, those commands. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:15 am
Code Regs. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:25 pm
The Court of Appeal did not agree: [30] An intention to create an exhaustive code may be expressly stated in the legislation or it may be implied. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:32 am
The style of the case is Benbow v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
Code Ann. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:26 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
