Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 9,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In Maryland, and in most states, the medical malpractice doctrine of “informed consent” requires that doctors (in a non-emergency setting) present the patient with important information about the nature of their ailment, the nature of the proposed treatment, the probability of success of contemplated therapy and its alternatives, and the risk of unfortunate consequences associated with such treatment. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
That argument was rejected citing the case of the United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:37 am
By Daniel RichardsonStella v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:06 am
In Mathew Knowles & Music World Entertainment v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The decisions are Gross v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
LACEY V. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am
Here are some examples: http://www.canadianhealthandcaremall.com/http://www.walgreens-store.comhttp://www.c-v-s-pharmacy.com“Illegal online pharmacies put American consumers’ health at risk by selling potentially dangerous products. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
The only case the court had before it from a state court in one of the four states at issue was an unpublished decision in Linnen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:28 am
Forged's attorney sent Guzman's attorney a "Rule 11" letter stating that they had agreed to submit the matter to Judge Katie Kennedy of Judicial Workplace Arbitrations. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:52 pm
In Bakoss v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm
Plaintiff originally filed his complaint in state court and it included claims against his non-diverse doctors. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm
Ball State University According to the Supreme Court’s landmark cases in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:25 am
Thanks to Jay Lefkowitz at Kirkland for letting us know of his win in Guarino v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
The comp system has been around for years, sometimes triple-digit years in most states. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Sciara v. [read post]
