Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 8,250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 10:02 am
Jan Brewer’s lawsuit challenging her own state’s medical marijuana law. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
We should put burden of proof on data holders: prove you can’t provide same services with less data, or be quiet. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
” Today’s granted cases: Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Holder, No. 10-694. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Some more detailed thoughts and questions about the bill: Comparison to SOPA and PROTECT IP SOPA and PROTECT IP provide for both actions by the Attorney General and actions by copyright holders, the OPEN Act provides only for actions by copyright holders. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:32 am
(It is possible that there may the decision in Golan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
In Stein v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
For purposes of determining whether an Internet site conducts business directed to residents of the United States under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission may consider, among other indicators, whether (i) the Internet site is providing goods or services to users located in the United States; (ii) there is evidence that the Internet site is not intended to provide goods and services to such users or access to or delivery of goods and services to such users; (iii) the Internet site… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:36 am
These doctrines include the Supreme Court's doctrines of overbreadth, vagueness, and prior restraint, as well as its decisions in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
So he's had seven additional years in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
" United States Fire Ins. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm
Given the resources you have to defend this as a financial services provider (see Gucci v Curveal), I doubt that there are beads of sweat on your forehead as you read this. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm
., v. [read post]
