Search for: "State v. Money" Results 5721 - 5740 of 20,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 8:45 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Court stated that the consequence of a failure to comply is a reduction of grant money, which can be avoided if the state provides an assurance that some of the grant money would be earmarked for the purpose of enabling the state to fully comply with the federal requirements. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by Eliana Baer
’” In examining the issue, the court specifically stated that “[t]he case of Finger v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am by Brian A. Comer
You can find his post here.In a nutshell, the decision seems to show a greater reliance on the punitive damages standards set forth in the United States Supreme Court decision of BMW of North America v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:51 pm
Patterson's attorney also stated, "In terms of money, that's not what we really want here," saying that what they really wanted was to make Ms. [read post]