Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 5721 - 5740 of 7,437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
It may be reversed only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion[.] [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
It may be reversed only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion[.] [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But, the filings added, the Circuit Court may consider, in the wake of Congress’s repeal legislation, whether to declare moot the case against the 1993 ban itself, and order the case dismissed, wiping out Judge Phillips’ injunction. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
Responding to his request, the Village provided Hawley with the list of all of the mayor’s cell phone calls for the period requested but one. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
X One X Productions (Copyright Litigation Blog) 1st Circuit: Attorneys fees and costs may far exceed damages in copyright infringement case: Spooner v EEN, Inc (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions TTAB non-shocker: Summary judgment denied as to fraud: Atlas Flowers, Inc. d/b/a Golden Flowers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm by Lauren Moak
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am by Susan Brenner
(According to a footnote in the opinion, they’re called “inquest subpoenas” because the relevant statue says that ““[u]pon the written application of the state's attorney, a judge of the superior court may institute and conduct an inquest upon any criminal matter under investigation by the state's attorney” and “in furtherance of the inquest,” the “judge may issue necessary process to bring… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
[U]nlike rules, policy statements may not operate to revoke a . . . benefit or privilege conferred by law. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:45 am by Steve Davies
May petitioners seek pre-enforcement judicial review of the administrative compliance order pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. [read post]