Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 7,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 6:14 pm
Federal criminal law makes it a crime to distribute or possess digital images of minors engaged in sexual activity, an offense commonly known as possession of child pornography. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 6:14 pm
Federal criminal law makes it a crime to distribute or possess digital images of minors engaged in sexual activity, an offense commonly known as possession of child pornography. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
California is in the minority in this approach. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:57 pm
By Aida V. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:19 am
The United States Supreme Court addressed a grandparent’s right to visitation in the hallmark case Troxel v Granville (530 U.S. 57, 2000). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:17 pm
In Cleaning Up The Mess After United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:50 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:35 am
City of Panora v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
Naughton and his ilk -- become the concoctions of a minority -- and not just any minority, but a dissatisfied minority. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
” But in an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturning the California law, Chief Judge Alex Kozinski said that the 1968 ruling dealt with “a sub-category of obscenity — obscenity as to minors. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Lee Tawes III v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
[Note: this is the third post in a series on the history of the changes which were made by General Convention to the Constitution of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America beginning in 1889 and finalized in 1901. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
@font-face { font-family: "Arial"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } As I assume everyone knows, courts in the United States use the exclusionary rule to enforce the 4th Amendment. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Through our strategic partnerships with state and local law enforcement agencies, we are able to make a difference. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39027-2.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
United States, 526 U.S. 813, 817 (1999)). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
