Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 5721 - 5740 of 6,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
The United States has had an uneven record in prosecuting internet pharmacy cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
An award is allowed only where the court finds that ‘the position of the United States was vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:41 pm
On March 31 the Supreme Cout of the United States dismissed the writ of certiorari as impovidently granted in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:03 pm
William Irey ("Defendant") -- age 50 at sentencing -- pleaded guilty to using minors to engage in sexually explicit conduct outside the United States for the purpose of producing visual depictions of such conduct and transporting those images to the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:03 pm
William Irey ("Defendant") -- age 50 at sentencing -- pleaded guilty to using minors to engage in sexually explicit conduct outside the United States for the purpose of producing visual depictions of such conduct and transporting those images to the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
"Simply put, these structural dynamics will tend to recreate the difficulties seen in the context of nationwide class action litigation within the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
Shah whether he agreed that under United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Williams, 251 US 63 (1919) a 1919 United States Supreme Court decision which upheld, as against due process attack, a statute awarding statutory damages against a large railroad corporation which were 116 times the actual damages sustained, in cases involving the rail carrier's overcharging of its customers, on the ground that under the circumstances the award was not so severe and oppressive as to be wholly disproportionate to the offense and obviously… [read post]