Search for: "C & S Company, Inc."
Results 5741 - 5760
of 7,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
S. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
Jeung Pacific Gas and Electric Company 06/17/2011 Kevin E. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
§ 227(b)(1)(C). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:31 am
Domains by Proxy, Inc. and Sonia Long, D2009-1435 (WIPO December 10, 2009) (Complainant had trademark rights in his personal name, which he used in connection with his fashion design business); Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm
” FDA’s failure to provide clear statements on the issue has led some companies to interpret the law and FDA’s patent listing regulations at 21 C.F.R. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:11 pm
(“Ardor”), sued its competitor Real Estate Group of New York, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:24 am
That’s the market. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:12 pm
C § 2708. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
PSKS, Inc., 127 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Pharma & Biotech intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:05 pm
Wall Street On Demand, Inc., 674 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc. (1987) 195 C al.App.3rd 692, the court spent considerable time evaluating the purpose of Code of Civil Procedure section 998. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Most often, these will be private funds exempt from registering under Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, but would also include a private fund exempt under another section of the Investment Company Act as long as the adviser treats such fund as a private fund under the Investment Advisers Act for all purposes. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court beginning with Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company to be heard on Monday 18 to Wednesday 20 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
Richardson Industries, Inc., doing business as Richco Structures, settled a retaliation lawsuit for $22,500. [read post]
