Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 5741 - 5760 of 7,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 1:16 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Once a Claim Form (DWC-1) has been sent to an employer, the employer level investigation should occur by the claims administrator with cooperation from the employer. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has already heard arguments this term in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
The official and his wife were evacuated from Tashkent, the location of the USAID headquarters in Uzbekistan, by the State Department, for evaluation. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 9:46 pm by Stephen Masterson
Raimondo and West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
Life Investors, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 313, 317 [223 Cal.Rptr. 539], superseded by statute as stated in Cooper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
An end of sorts finally arrived in June, when Manhattan’s Appellate Division – First Department issued Fuks v Rakia Assocs., 228 AD3d 501 [1st Dept 2024]. [read post]