Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 108,004
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
It does not appear from Mr Reddin’s letter of 18 September 2009 that he had applied his mind to the issue that the United Synagogue wishes to pursue. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
Actavis does not support expedition of the appeals, but Warner-Lambert does. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
The Education Law does not bar a probationer from serving an agreed upon extension of his or her probationary period. 2013 NY Slip Op 05818, Appellate Division, Second Department The essential facts leading to this appeal are as follows: 1. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
” In considering whether the homeless defendant has a residence for purposes of SORA, the Court of Appeals explained that “[t]he provisional location where a homeless person happens to spend the night does not fall within the ambit of these definitions. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
(…) Scrutinizer moved for permission to file an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Its introduction into the appeal proceedings is only with the consent of the appellant-proprietor, see G10/91, which it does not give. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
that the subsequent purchaser rule does apply to cases . [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
[At 28 and 29] Just because it is limited to a single species does not make it a plant variety. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:30 am
"Noting that each of these four element had been satisfied in this instance and Petitioner "does not argue that these four elements of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine have not been met" but, rather, argued that the Rooker-Feldman abstention "simply does not apply to his case because the state court judgment violated the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:30 am
"Noting that each of these four element had been satisfied in this instance and Petitioner "does not argue that these four elements of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine have not been met" but, rather, argued that the Rooker-Feldman abstention "simply does not apply to his case because the state court judgment violated the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
On appeal again to the circuit court, the court held it lacked jurisdiction because a contested case hearing was not required. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:29 pm
The Supreme Court does not move fast - this is not a case that we will see briefed and argued and decided before the 11 o'clock news. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 10:36 am
, and is asking a federal court of appeals to reverse the decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:00 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, striking down the limits on judicial review as unconstitutional. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial court’s finding of no CEQA violation, but disagreed with its general plan inconsistency determination, reversing on the latter point with directions to enter a new judgment denying all mandate relief. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:40 am
Adverse testimony does not have to be corroborated for a jury to credit that testimony. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 2:50 am
In Doe v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:45 am
An employee bringing an age discrimination claim does not need to state the age of the individuals who replaced him in the lawsuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania: Does a proceeding before the United States Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals constitute a “suit” such as to trigger insurance coverage under a commercial general liability policy? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:34 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that does not exempt an auto insurer from having to payout uninsured motorist (UM) benefits. [read post]
