Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 12,387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2016, 2:50 pm
Id at 1. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 12:29 am
"Article 2(a) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 require the prior express consent of the author for any reproduction or communication to the public of his work, including in digital format. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:57 pm
51% Yes (1)20 No (2)29 Undecided/Don't Know (8) Proposition 66 "yes" is ahead of "no" by 20% or more across all party IDs, both white and non-white voters, all education levels, both sexes, all income levels but the lowest, and all age groups but the youngest. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:12 am
Id. at § 158(a)(1). [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:12 am
Id. at § 158(a)(1). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Act of March 3, 1897, c. 395, 29 Stat. 695. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
The full opinion of Lord Brodie:HIGH COURT OF JUSTICIARY [2016] HCJAC 93 HCA/2016-24/XJNOTE BY LORD BRODIE in BILL OF SUSPENSION by CLYDE AND CO (SCOTLAND) LLP Complainers;against THE PROCURATOR FISCAL, EDINBURGH Respondent:Complainers: Smith QC; Clyde & CoRespondent: No appearance22 July 2016[1] The complainers in this bill of suspension are a limited liability partnership, being solicitors with a place of business at Albany House,… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
1, 2016) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, Case No. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:54 am
Ranks et Vasiļevičs is a case concerning two Latvian nationals who are alleged to have sold copyright-protected Microsoft software on an online marketplace between 29 December 2001 and 22 December 2004 (see also here). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Massachusetts Appeals Court in a case which, while it does not involve criminal activity, does raise an interesting issue about divorce, contempt and technology. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:44 pm
” Plaintiff also claims he was assigned to heavier and more 1 difficult lifting in [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Princeton University and Sciences Po Law presented Synesthesia of Law Sept. 29 (evening) to Oct. 1, 2016, at Princeton. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:13 am
For example, the final rule does not apply to: (1) grants; (2) contracts and agreements with and grants to the Indian Tribes; and (3) construction and services contracts that are exempt from coverage under the DBA or the SCA. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
If it does, the car’s engine will not start. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
If it does, the car’s engine will not start. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
The California Supreme Court considered these and other scenarios during an hour-long oral argument on September 29, as it asked, What does it mean to not “work” during a rest break? [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:29 am
No. 72, at para. 29. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:52 am
Articles 5 to 8 of Directive 2001/29/EC [the InfoSoc Directive] and Directive 2012/28/EU [the Orphan Works Directive] shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect of the rights referred to in paragraph 1. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:55 am
Ethiopia Objectors 1. [read post]
