Search for: "F. v. R." Results 5741 - 5760 of 20,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 12:00 am by Jason
Blagojevich, 526 F.3d 1074, 1081 (7th Cir. 2008). . . [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Boston, 693 F.3d 61, 73 (1st Cir. 2012) (concluding that “the government may regulate the carrying of concealed weapons outside of the home”); Moore v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Commission’s action, commenting that: The false statement made in petitioner's firefighter application alone constitutes a violation of Civil Service Law §50(4)(f); and The penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, citing Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Commission’s action, commenting that: The false statement made in petitioner's firefighter application alone constitutes a violation of Civil Service Law §50(4)(f); and The penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, citing Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
En novembre 2011, il fait faire une estimation de la réparation pour un montant de 719,83$ et transmet une mise en demeure à Ford, s'appuyant sur une brochure publicitaire visant les véhicules Lincoln MKX 2007 remise lors de l'achat du véhicule qui, selon lui, est couverte par la garantie. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
En novembre 2011, il fait faire une estimation de la réparation pour un montant de 719,83$ et transmet une mise en demeure à Ford, s'appuyant sur une brochure publicitaire visant les véhicules Lincoln MKX 2007 remise lors de l'achat du véhicule qui, selon lui, est couverte par la garantie. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 – Read judgment The general rule in civil law cases is that the loser pays the winner’s legal costs, even if the case settles before trial. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Brown Clinic, P.L.L.P., 531 F.3d 568, 574-75 (8th Cir. 2008).Washington:  Larson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 10:08 am by Jason C. Gavejian
  Speaking at the Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference in Brussels, Paul F. [read post]