Search for: "Federal Insurance Company "
Results 5741 - 5760
of 21,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 2:05 pm
At least the company is handling the data breach well. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Allstate Insurance Company, No. 2:21-CV-01274-PLD (W.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 9:40 pm
He has dealt with complex Southern California white collar crime cases, like insurance fraud, on both sides for decades. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:08 pm
LabMD recently announced its plans to wind down operations, citing its ongoing legal battle with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over the company’s data security practices as a major cause. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:47 am
Court, MD Tennessee 2015 Related Blog Posts: Primary UIM Insurer May Not Offset Medical Payments Made by Injured Passenger’s Insurance Company in Tennessee, February 18, 2015, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Tennessee Court Denies Grocery Store’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Premises Liability Case, January 21, 2015, Knoxville Injury Lawyer Blog Photo Credit: pippalou, MorgueFile.com The post Tennessee Federal Court Upholds Jury Verdict in Favor of… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:54 am
We are not making a prejudgment, but we do expect insurance companies to explain the rate impact of higher gas prices and the resulting dramatic reduction in driving we are seeing in the latest federal statistics. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:19 am
Under the proposed new rules, the government is pushing much of its risk not onto insurance companies, but onto veterans themselves. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:00 am
The carrier removed the action to the federal court. [read post]
26 May 2012, 11:22 am
The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office announced Thursday that it has settled, for $750,000, a data breach lawsuit filed against South Shore Hospital under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
A federal appellate court accepted his thinking, giving rise to the legal doctrine of the “triple trigger” for insurance coverage. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
That measure is certain to include a government-run insurance option.At their heart, all the bills would require insurance companies to sell coverage to any applicant, without charging higher premiums for pre-existing medical conditions. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
Consider obligations to federal regulators like the FTC regarding deceptive consumer practices and FDA’s oversight over medical devices, for example. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
Consider obligations to federal regulators like the FTC regarding deceptive consumer practices and FDA’s oversight over medical devices, for example. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
April 19, 2023) (Op. by Mundy, J.), the court ruled that the removal of a vehicle from a multiple motor vehicle insurance policy, in which stacked coverage had been previously waived through a waiver form executed by the insured, did not require the insurance carrier to secure a renewed expressed waiver of stacked coverage under §1738(c).The basic rationale of the Court was that Section 1738 requires insurance companies to secure a new written waiver… [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Class Action Counsel Obtained Significant Benefit through Class Action Settlement Following 10-Year Litigation but Requested Multiplier was Excessive given Billing Rates of Class Counsel, Warranting Multiplier of 1.5 rather than 1.79 as Requested New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action in New York state court against his automobile insurance company following its payment of insurance benefits that allegedly “did not reflect the… [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:01 am
In 2004, they revisited the question pursuant to the DOL’s revised white-collar rules as well as a federal court ruling finding the company’s auto damages adjusters were exempt. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:43 pm
When an insurance policy has a deductible, the insurance company will pay the entire claim and then seek repayment for the deductible from its insured. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
A federal district court in California has certified several Rule 23 classes and conditionally certified an FLSA collective action in a wage suit filed by call center employees who alleged their insurance company employer failed to pay them for pre-shift time they had to spend ramping up for duty (Ribot v Farmers Insurance Group, July 18, 2013, Pregerson, D). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
The relevant exclusion, Exclusion 21 to the Policy, provides in pertinent part that the policy does not cover loss arising from “a claim by, or on behalf of, or at the behest of, and other insured person, the company, or any successor, trustee, assignee or receiver of the company. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:39 pm
But if you were an insurance company, and you had the choice of paying claims out of your own pocket or someone else's, which would you pick? [read post]
