Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
You can watch the final, unique proceedings on ParliamentLive. 30 July: appeal hearings Joint appeal hearings from 10.30am and 2pm on the right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order from within the UK: BA (Nigeria) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) and others PE (Cameroon) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) (Consolidated Appeals) 30 July: House of Lords… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:58 am
Scheps fka Papparazzo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Although in matrimonial matters, the award of counsel fees is typically a discretionary decision, see R. 5:3-5(c), “[i]f the parties have stipulated by agreement that the husband will pay counsel fees to the wife in an amount to be fixed by the court, the court cannot refuse to allow any counsel fees at all. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
In an unpublished decision, the Michigan court of appeals voided a prenuptial agreement based upon findings that Husband had subjected Wife to years of mental and physical abuse. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Similarly, Van Alstyne argues, suppose the state gives husbands and wives the right to block an abortion, (which, in effect, gives the husband a right to block an abortion, since the wife already has the right not to have an abortion under Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 4:31 pm
" Zelig v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
As a result, the ex-husband was limited to trial cross-examination of the ex-wife as to equitable distribution. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:09 am
w Amlin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
That was the question answered by the court in Rolseth v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:32 am
In Shinitzky v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:34 pm
This is the latest progeny of Baxendale v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 7:39 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 5:21 pm
” In O’Brien v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
If the wife becomes pregnant through donor insemination from a third party's sperm, then there is no possibility or pretense that her husband was physically involved in impregnating her, and the statutory goal is to recognize the intended family grouping and ensure that the resulting child has two legal parents from the moment of its birth. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 3:16 am
Supreme Court's complete decision here: Lane v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:34 am
IN Koch v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:48 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:48 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
Michigan, 516 US 442 (1996) (holding that car jointly owned by husband and wife was forfeitable despite wife’s innocence in crime of which husband was found guilty). [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:10 am
For a complete copy of the recent decision Leff v Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP. [read post]
