Search for: "I v. B"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 24,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
Code § 666(a)(1)(B)” and “extortion under color of official right in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, no infringement under Article 9(2)(c) was found either.Similarly, the court excluded passing off, since no likelihood of confusion could be established under Article 9(2)(b). [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 3:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:42 pm
I should throw one more idea in the mix: the trope of the “honest but unfortunate debtor,” a phrase from the Depression-era Supreme Court decision in Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:16 pm
Mallet acknowledged that he had lied stating: “I lied alot cause I had to keep my job. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
§ 6511(a), (b)(1). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am
Spouse and minor children can also avail of work authorization and travel permission after they file their I-485 applications. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
I use it. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:49 am
When I blogged earlier this week about the 16 companies who have filed no-action requests related to shareholder proposals seeking proxy access, I forgot to mention the growing phenomena of some companies taking the “group” concept out of management’s proxy access proposal. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:30 pm
Another way to describe it is that the employment at will rule applies where there is no contract (a) setting a definite duration, and (b) limiting the employer’s discretion to terminate the employee. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:23 pm
Brahmana v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
§ 1.170A-13(c)(4)(i)(B), because it had serious doubts about the taxpayer’s ability to take a charitable contribution deduction. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
§ 1.170A-13(c)(4)(i)(B), because it had serious doubts about the taxpayer’s ability to take a charitable contribution deduction. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Moge v London Borough of Ealing (2023) EWCA Civ 464 Another one that I am apparently late in writing up. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
Cisco Tech. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
They are selected for a) the firms that litigate (practicing v. non-practicing), b) the patents that are litigated (individual, portfolio, lead), and c) the cases that are litigated to judgment (default, settlement, summary judgment, trial).In the realm of which firms and patents litigate, most of the studies have looked at the litigation level, comparing characteristics of patents and technology with samples of those patents and technologies that were not litigated. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Co. v Barnes, 199 AD2d 257). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
Code § 2252(a)(4)(B), Richard Stanley moved to suppress certain evidence. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
(Leader v. [read post]
