Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 15,748
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 3:02 pm
If you’re a public employer, comply with the Cellular Communications Interception Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
Dombrovskis reinstated his objective to strive for closer harmonisation of the current anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) legal framework, and he pledged that the supervision and coordination of AML and CTF rules should be transferred to the EU level. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:02 am
Topics include legal operations, privacy, IPOs and government investigations. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 1:37 pm
This ensures the child can build or continue a relationship with both parents. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm
Recent debates between the government and the private sector over encryption are reminiscent of the Clipper Chip debate of the mid-1990s; and while governments wrestle with how best to re-craft rules to protect individual privacy, the collection and use of personal information grows exponentially. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:42 pm
The Oversight Board is made up disproportionately of lawyers and legal scholars, and such people like making rules. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:37 pm
The argument is wrong as both a legal and technical matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
After graduation from college, I continued to play competitive "club" tennis that took me to many tournaments throughout the East Coast. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In re M.F. raises the question whether the co-parent has the same rights even without an express co-parenting agreement.The court began its opinion with a discussion of the basic rules of parentage in Kansas. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
The series continues by examining some of the problems with the proposal itself. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm
"Who knows," Trent continued. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
"Who knows," Trent continued. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
This is a critical failure on the court’s part and should not have occurred especially when the Delhi High Court had specifically addressed the question and ruled that there is not presumption of constitutionality in the case of a pre-constitutional legislation. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
And finally, even if you do NOT yet have a union at the workplace, these rules (such as blanket prohibitions on employees' discussions of wages) may still apply, so if you're concerned, be sure to seek appropriate legal counsel. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
In In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., the court clarified three key aspects of certification procedure that heighten judicial obligations. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Even if there is some backroom legal expertise, this only exacerbates the problem because that is not where important rulings should emanate. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
As a result of the Court’s decision, the validity of the two-member panel’s rulings and any actions resulting from those rulings are questionable. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:33 am
In Re: Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Continuing for a moment our theme of related relists, Triple Canopy, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
This case was remitted for re-hearing on that issue. [read post]
