Search for: "In Re Robert" Results 5741 - 5760 of 15,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
I think one should see these lawsuits as what they are, posturing by conservative Republican state attorneys general who believe it will help them achieve re-nomination and re-election or promotion to some higher office, and they’re being egged on by a distinct group of legal academics who have their own constitutional and ideological hobbyhorses to ride. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:40 am
(Before I get to the legal doctrine here:  If you're a government official, is there any better way to prove you're a douch[e]bag than by punishing a teenager for calling you a douchbag on a blog? [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
Add AI that learns from sharing “colleagues”, and a newfound determination to address the real challenge Robert Samek advocated to re-examine the very ground on which we stand. [read post]
10 Feb 2006, 9:54 pm
Unfortunately, the Court did not re-write it in the clear manner that a taxing statute requires. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Brett Trout
During oral arguments in In re Bilski, United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts questioned one of the attorneys on the written brief. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:33 am
**See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/epoeba-to-review-warf-stem-cell.html****SEPARATELYIn the quirky world of California politics, a lobbying group of Robert Klein, who happens to be head of CIRM, is opposing legislation to alter CIRM (SB1565). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm by Dave Hoffman
 But, again, we’re really only talking about one Justice’s mind here, and his deciding vote (which, if pro-ACA, the betting money suggests that Roberts would join). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:55 pm
[IPBiz note: in a re-exam, the USPTO does NOT "amend" claims. [read post]
6 May 2007, 4:13 pm
. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. [read post]