Search for: "Kat" Results 5741 - 5760 of 6,603
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Surely you are not laying yourselves open to the accusation (which no polite Kat would make) of being so pusillanimous that you can't even tell the ACG whether you propose to intervene in this case? [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
The IPKat assumes that this must be retaliation for the criticisms which this weblog has from time to time dished out to the British government, which has a cordial relationship with China, since the Kat can't think of anything he has written about the Chinese themselves that would merit such a response. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:28 am
This Kat -- a long-standing member of the INTA himself -- is among those who, possibly unfairly, suspect that not too many non-US members of this excellent publication actually read it, since both in content and style it has a very American feel to it.Right: Among the British guardsmen is a fake imported guard who gave Customs the slip at Heathrow. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:16 am
One particularly unwelcome view is that the language regime of the Court’s proposed central registry (which would conduct litigation in the language of the patent - English, French or German) is not compatible with the rights of Defendants who do not work in such languages [what about us poor English, who have been trying all morning to get an English-language copy of what looks like a French-only text, growls the Kat].So where does this leave the EEUPC dossier? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:06 am
But, and that's the punchline: those of their competitors... association with Snooki is obviously considered seriously detrimental to your brand image.Ever the lawyer, this Kat wonders: is this actionable (leaving questions of proof aside)? [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
The Kat makes no comment on the fact that the internet bears traces of more than one set of Blawggies (see Dennis Kennedy's Blawggies here, for instance) and that Blawggies are presumably quite different from the Bloggies, here. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 1:08 pm
n banka kredi faizlerinden 3.5 kat fazla oldu? [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:21 am
Sigismund Hermbstädt, for example, a chemistry and pharmacy professor in Berlin, who has long since disappeared into the oblivion of history, earned more royalties for his "Principles of Leather Tanning" published in 1806 than British author Mary Shelley did for her horror novel "Frankenstein," which is still famous today.This Kat wonders how Hermbstädt could earn substantial royalties absent copyright protection, but maybe he is missing the point. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:46 am
Just a few short weeks ago, when the world awaited the pronouncement of the US Supreme Court in In re Bilski (see Kat notes here, here, here, here and here), you just couldn't go online without bumping into the B-word. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
Who but Sweet & Maxwell -- displaying once again what a less kind reviewer than this Kat might term chronic ineptitude when it comes to getting their printed products on to any meaningful web presence -- would publish and sell a book which is red [even though the IPKat is notoriously colour-blind, he does occasionally recognise that colour], but display online a book which is, without any shade of doubt, black? [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
Another blog to which the Kat has just been introduced is K's Law, a visually striking and culturally stimulating weblog dedicated to the case law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 1:14 pm
The Kat also liked the lively chapter on ownership and transactions, which anyone thinking of licensing a patent and its related technology should read before leaping into a licence agreement (anyone for 'best endeavours'?). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:51 am
Merpel is absolutely certain, though, that there must be some incredibly important reason why non-EU-based Community trade mark applicants must be forced to instruct an EU professional representative -- possibly to protect them from fatal accidents -- and that the suggestion of "self-interest" must never be allowed to enter our thoughts.If anyone has any information or comments on this issue, the Kats would love to learn more about it. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm
Most Kats are, by nature, averse to change. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:56 am
If so, the Kats would all love to know.Twenty Questions hereTwenty Seven Questions hereEurope's first institution for resolving referred questions hereWhy Don't You Answer? [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Merpel adds, there's a lot more factual detail and legal analysis in the judgment than this little note suggests.Both Kats wonder whetherWrotham Park damages fall within the provision of the IP Enforcement Directive 2004/48. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
and industrial applicability in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, noted by the IPKat here, is (according to a normally reliable source whom the Kat thanks) to be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 October. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:16 pm
The Kat soon found that this article, by John Robbins (author of The New Good Life, Diet For A New America), published last week on the Huffington Post, was on quite a different topic. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:10 pm
To reduce paperwork, the Kat prefers participants to bring payment with them [cheques payable to "J. [read post]