Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 29,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:26 am
I did not know much about the United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:13 am
In fact, the two vendors deployed most prominently in the United States, Voatz and Democracy Live, have been subject to scathing assessments by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Michigan researchers, who found a slew of basic security and privacy flaws that could allow concerted adversaries to reveal, alter or deny a voter’s ballot. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Hyatt ; Janus v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in McGirt v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
Connecticut as the dangerous precursor to Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm
Evidence began this morning, in the case of Amica v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
As we look back at the past ten years in data protection, we have seen considerable legal progress in granting users’ control over their personal lives. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
Two of the dead were state troopers. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:45 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:36 am
In Stokes v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Ohio (1961), which held that evidence seized unlawfully by the police could not be introduced in a state criminal prosecution, and Gideon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Jack names this early on as the common commitment of modern constitutionalism, whether “originalist” or “living” (and, might one add, “living originalist”?) [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Public.Resource.Org that dealt with eligibility of copyright protection, stating that the non-authoritative status of annotations indicated that the creation of the annotations would fall outside of legislative duties.And even more recently, she authored the long-awaited decision regarding the "Booking.com" service mark, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
