Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5741 - 5760 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 8:14 am
Some of these may matter more but in the end, the show released to the public is what you expect to see whether the program is on network television or on a DVD release.Yet when some of these shows come onto DVD, they hit the market without original music and in some cases, the episodes aren't even the original, network presentation. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And perception is reality in legal systems: if the public doesn't accept the legitimacy of a particular kind of judging, that may be reason enough to reject such judging, even if we think the public's views aren't rational. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 12:01 pm by Gene Takagi
We were told to be proactive, engage policymakers (look for the best partners), meet in-person, don’t just send policy geeks, and don’t disregard working with candidate who lost but still hold great influence. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 6:38 am
Of course, if I were the one being asked, since I'm at the absolute 180° opposite end of the spectrum from our friend Mort Pierce, I would choose Answer B in a heartbeat. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 9:18 am by Intelligent Challenge
I read a great book recently called “The World Cafe; Shaping The Future Through Conversations That Matter” (by Brown and Isaacs). [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 7:26 am by Peter de la Cruz
§§ 151, et seq. [5] The 1996 Act contains a Savings Clause and an No Implied Effect Clause, see, § 601(b)(1) and (c)(1). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:24 am by Broc Romanek
Exchange Act Rule 14a-4(b)(1) requires that a form of proxy permit a shareholder to vote for or against or to abstain from voting on each separate matter other than the election of directors or say-on-frequency votes. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:41 pm by Leo Katz, guest-blogging
As a matter of logic, it can’t be done.Perhaps the most important implication this has for lawyers is that they really need not feel bad about exploiting loopholes, no worse anyway than a parliamentarian who makes use of a killer amendment.But perhaps you in fact think the parliamentarian ought to feel bad about using a killer amendment? [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:09 am by Guest & Gray
It means that it doesn’t necessarily have to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and it doesn’t as a matter of face have to be “reasonably calculated”, it only has to appear to be reasonably calculated. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Let’s deal with the bias in the system; it doesn’t matter whether it comes from a human or from an AI trained on the past practices of humans. [read post]