Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 6,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 6:08 pm
I was not swayed by the narrowly-defined study of a clearly tiny sample group by an involved clinician with a potential financial interest in the outcome, as was documented in an article yesterday at Parent Central (h/t Tamara E.) [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 8:03 am
Mark Lemley is the William H. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2924 v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:54 am
H's initial salary was set at about 1/3rd what he had earned in the prior job.The new business never did well, and didn't generate a profit. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 6:56 pm
(Or, for that matter, that the plaintiffs didn't have faith in theirs.) [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Recent case- IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN H. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
The terminology doesn't matter for its own sake, but it is important to be clear about the meaning of the phrase when discussing path dependency. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:50 am
” If a client wants a particular lawyer, odds are they’ll get them, no matter where they are. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:13 am
(H/T: My former colleague Joel Goldstein). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Charles H. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Charles H. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Charles H. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:11 am
But I’m a lawyer, not a miracle worker (H/T to obxlaw), so be patient. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
In-house human resources and company recruiters, no matter how effective, view the legal marketplace through an imperfect or misrepresentative prism, and tunnel vision is their occupational hazard.Just as physicians are cautioned against treating members of their own families, so too is it folly for an in-house H/R professional to believe that they have an undistorted and unbiased picture of the legal employment landscape. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
Don’t get ripped off. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
This matter concerns date on which the transfer penalty should start for Petitioners. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 10:42 am
We did a terrible job publicizing the panel -- and the speakers' names weren't included in the main packet. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
Dep't. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:04 am
If that is the case, he wouldn’t qualify under the Age Test. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
(H/T Walter Olson) [read post]
