Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 5741 - 5760 of 7,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
by Mark Cuban in Business Insider The best analogy for traders? [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
I've often written here about the problems of the naive, black-or-white view of economics that has been fostered by the Chicago School and Milton Friedman acolytes who talk of "free markets" as though markets exist in vaccum tubes unaffected by the social, cultural and legal context around them. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:00 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Until that time, however, companies will have to work with OGD to ensure timely approval actions, or consider plan B options, such as litigation or pressing Congress for a legislative solution. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:04 am by Sandy Levinson
I do want to pick up on Mark Tushnet's post, regarding her article on Presidential Administration. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:26 am
§ 156(g)(4)(B)(i); see also 21 C.F.R. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
But thanks to what critics say is Delaware's one-size-fits-all system, he's a marked man. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:55 am
(EDTexweblog.com) How long do I wait for a first office action (Patently-O) Patent pendency: Reconsidering expedited examination (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions Court rules that corporate executive’s failure to inform USPTO of material information renders patent unenforceable: Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
“Office of the White House Counsel” in Mark Green and Michele Jolin, eds. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:35 am by Jeff Foust
“There is growing support, I think, in Congress for support of a program which would sustain the US industrial base capability in solid propulsion and also sustain the heavy lift vehicle by accelerating the bridge on heavy lift that is in the president’s plan for 2017,” he said. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:08 am by Stephen Lubben
There is nothing in the new law that would prevent a big bank from demanding both mark to market and "additional" collateral in connection with an OTC trade. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:34 pm
I was surprised that so many people appeared shocked by this finding. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Please click here to contribute to Mark Critz for Congress. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:26 pm by Gideon
The reason I mention all of this is that the other day, I was reading Mark Bennett’s series of interesting posts on jury selection in Texas. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:42 am by LindaMBeale
This is why I have long been worried about the "safe harbor" for mark-to-market rules for tax purposes under section 475, which lets banks use various types of financial statements to determine their "mark" that sets their income for tax purposes. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm by Erin Miller
I would add another encomium: innovative legal problem solver. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:59 am by Marvin Ammori
I find it hard to believe, but public choice theory suggests that the incumbent corporate insiders will win. [read post]